Mary de Muth asks if the Lausanne Conference is a colossal waste of money, brains and time. I’m not going to bury the lede here: forget the question mark; I think it is.
I don’t know Mary at all and I don’t intend any disrespect to her, but by blogging about this she’s provided me some raw meat to get my teeth into. Let’s have a look at why she says it isn’t a waste, as that’ll help me spur my thoughts about why it is. Read more about Lausanne in the age of the Internet
The Simple Pastor links to a FAQ about the difference between Mormonism and what the Gospel Coalition grandly calls “Biblical” Christianity. (This is already a red flag for me; is there any other kind?) It turns out to be the sort of thing that makes me sad for the state of apologetics. The FAQ is a dubious collection of proof-texts with no developed argument and no exegesis. Biblical Christianity is, apparently, a facile and one-dimensional Christianity. Read more about Apologetics should take the Bible seriously
They love the place of honor at banquets and the best seats in the synagogues and elaborate greetings in the marketplaces, and to have people call them ‘Rabbi.’ But you are not to be called ‘Rabbi,’ for you have one Teacher and you are all brothers. And call no one your ‘father’ on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Nor are you to be called ‘teacher,’ for you have one teacher, the Christ. The greatest among you will be your servant. And whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.
I wonder when we’ll get these verses. I mean, really get them. Read more about Self-aggrandisment
When Christians attack each other, that makes me sad; we’re supposed to be a unified body.
When Christian leaders publically fire accusations of heresy at each other of heresy first and Matthew 18:15-16 be damned, that makes me sad; we’re supposed to bear with one another in love.
But when Christian leaders unfairly abuse their authority to baselessly and unfairly attack others, throwing in accusations of heresy just to make a point, that makes me angry. And I’ve just read something that made me really, really angry. Read more about It makes me angry, then it makes me sad
When he got home his mother (my sister) and father were waiting inside for him. My sister wept as he came into the house and asked him “what did I do wrong?” Her husband told him that “he wasn’t raised to be queer” and that he needed to be cured of his sin. They had already notified their church’s pastor and youth pastor. The church told them to send him there for a conference immediately after he got home.
My nephew got into the car and decided he didn’t need to be cured of anything. Instead, he decided he was headed to my house in Florida. He knew here that he would find love, compassion, and understanding. He knew if he went to the church he’d be ridiculed and told that he was defective and needed to be “cured”. He told me a story of how a boy in his youth group committed suicide a few years ago and in his suicide note he admitted he was gay. He had been convinced that he didn’t deserve to live since he couldn’t be cured of homosexuality. (I know that sounds crazy, but some people actually think like that.) My nephew didn’t want to be like that.
OK, I know it’s America, and they do things differently there. But still: “he knew if he went to the church he’d be ridiculed and told that he was defective.” That’s what we look like to people, and probably for good reason.
Revivalism was based on the ability to ‘sell’ evangelism. In the last twenty years, however, the market for this born-again product has declined in the United States and has all but collapsed in the United Kingdom. As evangelism as event and product has waned, it has been replaced by worship as the chief activity and emphasis for Evangelical Christians… Some of the faces have changed, and festivals such as Soul Survivor have burst onto the scene, but the culture of production has remained the same. The one key difference, however, is that now revivalism is selling worship and not evangelism, and intimacy rather than conversion.
- Pete Ward, “Selling Revival as Worship”
I see that in my own experience - churches which once focused on evangelistic initiatives are reinventing themselves as glorified record producers. Hillsongs has an awful lot to answer for. Read more about Pete Ward on selling revival as worship
I like the idea of reusing and rehabilitating words that have fallen out of fashion. At a time when others are struggling to call themselves “mission partners” or “overseas workers”, at least partially to avoid the “missionary” stereotype - pith helmets, white suits and a complete lack of cultural sensitivity - I happily call myself a “missionary” precisely because I want to butt up against that stereotype and make people think.
But I’m finding it doesn’t work for all words. Take, for instance, the word “denomination”… Read more about "Denomination"
…the people perish. At least, that’s what it says in Proverbs, (29:18) and so, despite the second part of the verse clearly reminding us that it’s talking about a vision of God, (in the Bible it’s a fair bet that most things are about God) hundreds of pastors have seen in this verse a Biblical mandate for them to construct a church Vision Statement.
Now having a Vision Statement and having a vision are two separate things - and if you want your church to have a vision of God it’s almost always better for them not to have a vision statement - but let’s leave that for the moment and have a think about what makes a good and what makes a not-so-good vision statement. Read more about Where there is no vision...
I was about to write something about how evangelical authors (I was looking particularly at Chris Wright, in his “Mission of God”) do not take canon formation seriously, because if they did, then Chicago-inerrancy gets a bit fuzzy and then they realise they don’t have a magisterium. All die, oh the embarrassment.
And then along came this quote, which is superb: Read more about Biblical Inerrancy once again